![](./fa4pc54n.png)

> Departamento de Engenharia Química
>
> Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia Química
>
> Integração e intensificação de processos
>
> Shell and Tubes Heat Exchangers
>
> **Docente** **Responsável:**
>
> Nuno Manuel Clemente de Oliveira
>
> **Integrantes** **do** **grupo:**

João Victor Vieira

> Matteo Gecchele


> **Introduction** **&** **Structure**
>
> The most common type of heat exchanger is the shell-and-tube, usually
> used in a lot of industrial applications. This type of heat exchanger
> has large number of tubes, sometimes several hundred, packed in a
> shell with their axes parallel to that of the shell. The heat transfer
> takes place between two fluid, one flowing inside the tubes and one
> flowing outside the tubes through the shell. Baffles are commonly
> placed in the shell to force the shell-side fluid to flow across the
> shell to enhance heat transfer, to maintain uniform spacing between
> the tubes and, also in order to maintain the turbulent flow inside the
> exchanger. The baffle spacing is usually not greater than a distance
> equal to the inside diameter or closer than a distance equal to
> one-fifth the inside diameter of the shell.
>
> Usually the shell-and-tube heat exchangers have large size and weight,
> and for this reason they are not using in automotive and aircraft
> applications. At both ends of the shell, the tubes open to some large
> flow areas, called headers, where the tube-side fluid accumulates
> before entering the tubes and after leaving them.
>![](./xvze01o4.png)
>
> Shell-and-tube heat exchangers are further classified according to the
> number of shell and tube passes involved. Heat exchangers in which all
> the tubes make one U-turn in the shell, for example, are called
> one-shell-pass and two-tube-passes heat exchangers. Likewise, a heat
> exchanger that involves two passes in the shell and four passes in the
> tubes is called a two-shell- passes and four-tube-passes heat
> exchanger.

![](./tnci3l31.png)![](./cncqllod.png)


> **Operation** **principle**
>
> In order to calculate the temperature difference ∆𝑡 in a 1-2
> exchanger, it is necessary to make some assumptions:
>
> 1\. The shell fluid temperature is an average isothermal temperature
> at any cross section
>
> 2\. There is an equal amount of heating surface in each pass 3. The
> overall coefficient of heat transfer is constant
>
> 4\. The specific heat of each fluid is constant 5. The flowrate of
> each fluid is constant
>
> 6\. There are not phase change (evaporation or condensation) in a part
> of the exchanger
>
> 7\. Heat losses are negligible
>
> The overall heat balance where ∆𝑡 is the true difference of
> temperatures, is:
>
> 𝑄 = 𝑈𝐴∆𝑡 = 𝑊𝐶(𝑇 − 𝑇 ) = 𝑤𝑐(𝑡2 − 𝑡1) where U is the heat transfer
> coefficient and A is the surface of contact.
>
> Shell-and-tube heat exchangers are complicated devices and the
> simplified approaches should be used with care. In fact, it is assumed
> that the overall heat transfer coefficient U is constant throughout
> the heat exchanger and that the convection heat transfer coefficients
> can be predicted using the convection correlations. However, in some
> practical application, the predicted value of U can exceed 30 percent.
> Thus, it is natural to tend to overdesign the heat exchangers in order
> to avoid unpleasant surprises.
>
> Heat transfer enhancement in heat exchangers is usually accompanied by
> increased
>
> pressure drop, and this causes higher pumping power. Therefore, any
> gain from the enhancement in heat transfer should be balanced against
> the cost of the accompanying pressure drop. Also, some thought should
> be given to which fluid should pass through the tube side and which
> through the shell side. Usually, the more viscous fluid is more
> suitable for the shell side (larger passage area and lower pressure
> drop) and the fluid with the higher pressure for the tube side.
>
> Usually, it is convenient to relate the equivalent temperature
> difference to the log
>
> mean temperature difference relation for the counter-flow case as
>
> ∆ 𝑙𝑚 = 𝐹∆ 𝑙𝑚,𝐶𝐹

where *F* is the correction factor**,** which depends on the geometry of
the heat exchanger and the inlet and outlet temperatures of the hot and
cold fluid streams. The

> ∆𝑇𝑚,𝐶𝐹 is the log mean temperature difference for the case of a
> counter-flow heat exchanger with the same inlet and outlet
> temperatures.
>
> The correction factor *F* for a shell-and-tube heat exchanger is shown
> in the figures below versus two temperature ratios *P* and *R* defined
> as
>
> 𝑡2 − 𝑡1 𝑇 − 𝑡1
>
> 𝑇 − 𝑇 𝑡2 − 𝑡1
>
> where the subscripts 1 and 2 represent the inlet and outlet*,*
> respectively. Note that for
>
> a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, *T* and *t* represent the shell-side
> and tube-side temperatures, respectively.

![](./gklfx0zi.png)

> **Factors** **that** **influence** **performances** *Fouling:*
>
> The performance of heat exchangers usually deteriorates with time as a
> result of accumulation of deposits on heat transfer surfaces. The
> layer of deposits represents additional resistance to heat transfer
> and this causes a decrease of the rate of heat transfer in a heat
> exchanger. The net effect of these accumulations on heat transfer is
> represented by a fouling factor, which is a measure of the thermal
> resistance introduced by fouling.
>
> For a shell-and-tube heat exchanger it possible to write the overall
> heat transfer relation as
>
> 𝑈𝐴𝑠 = 𝑈𝐴𝑖 = 𝑈0𝐴0 = 𝑅 = ℎ𝑖𝐴𝑖 + 𝐴𝑖𝑖 + ln⁡𝑈0𝐴0 𝑖) + 𝐴0 + ℎ0𝐴0
>
> where 𝐴𝑖 = 𝐷𝐿 and 𝐴0 = 𝐷0𝐿 L are the areas of inner and outer
> surfaces, and 𝑅,𝑖 and 𝑅,0 are the fouling factors at those surfaces.
>
> *Heat* *transfer* *rate:*
>
> The heat transfer rate is the most important parameter of a heat
> exchanger. A heat exchanger should be capable of transferring heat at
> the specified rate in order to achieve the desired temperature change
> of the fluid at the specified mass flow rate.
>
> *Size* *and* *Weight:*
>
> The heat exchanger is better if it is smaller and lighter, in
> particular, in the automotive and aerospace industries, where size and
> weight requirements are most stringent. For this reason,
> shell-and-tube heat exchangers cannot be used in this type of
> application. Also, a larger heat exchanger normally carries a higher
> price tag. The space available for the heat exchanger in some cases
> limits the length of the tubes that can be used.
>
> *Material:*
>
> The thermal and structural stress effects need not be considered at
> pressures below 15 *atm* or temperatures below 150*°C*. But these
> effects are major considerations above 70 *atm* or 550*°C* and
> seriously limit the acceptable materials of the heat exchanger.
>
> A temperature difference of 50*°C* or more between the tubes and the
> shell will probably pose differential thermal expansion problems and
> needs to be considered. In the case of corrosive fluids, we may have
> to select expensive corrosion-resistant materials such as stainless
> steel or even titanium.
>
> **Cost**
>
> The purchase cost of a shell and tube depends on the rear head type
> and on the heat transfer
>
> area (size factor). The relationship between the purchase cost and the
> size factor is
>
> represented in the graph below

![](./s1x5d1ti.png)

> Both fluids are usually forced to flow by pumps or fans that consume
> electrical power. The annual cost of electricity associated with the
> operation of the pumps and fans can be determined from
>
> 𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔⁡𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 𝑃𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔⁡𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟⁡\[𝑘𝑊\] × 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠⁡𝑜𝑓⁡𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛⁡\[ℎ\] ×
> 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑜𝑓⁡𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦⁡\[\$ 𝑘𝑊ℎ\]
>
> where the pumping power is the total electrical power consumed by the
> motors of the pumps and fans.
>
> Minimizing the pressure drop and the mass flow rate of the fluids will
> minimize the operating cost of the heat exchanger, but it will
> maximize the size of the heat exchanger and thus the initial cost. As
> a rule of thumb, doubling the mass flow rate will reduce the initial
> cost by half but will increase the pumping power requirements by a
> factor of roughly eight. Typically, fluid velocities encountered in
> heat exchangers range between 0.7 and 7 m/s for liquids and between 3
> and 30 m/s for gases. Low velocities are helpful in avoiding erosion,
> tube vibrations, and noise as well as pressure drop.
>
> **Advantages**:
>
> *Size:*
>
> Shell-and-tube heat exchangers are capable of providing a larger
> surface area for heat transfer to take place while having a shorter
> length overall due to presence of multiple tubes.
>
> *Heat* *duty:*
>
> Shell-and-tube heat exchangers can handle higher temperatures and
> pressures and hence higher heat duty. This is because besides
> providing a higher overall heat transfer coefficient, additions can
> also be made to negate thermal expansion effects and the thickness can
> also be varied (more in the next point).
>
> *Versatility:*
>
> From the design point of view, shell-and-tube heat exchangers are the
> most versatile of all heat exchangers. Being tubular in shape, heads /
> closures of required shape and thickness can be used. The number of
> tubes and tube pitch can be selected according to operating
> conditions. Expansion bellows can be used to negate thermal expansion
> effects, baffles if different cuts and spacings can be used to
> influence the overall heat transfer coefficients and there's even
> something called a floating head which can be added to negate thermal
> expansion of the tubes. The number of passes on shell side and tube
> side can be altered as well.
>
> **Disadvantages**:
>
> *Size:*
>
> This can also be a disadvantage as at lower heat duty, there are more
> compact heat exchangers such as plate type exchanger. Also, the
> absence of hairpin bends causes shell-and-tube heat exchangers to take
> up more space than double pipe heat exchangers in some cases.
>
> *Maintenance:*
>
> Cleaning of tubes is difficult and fouling is always an issue when
> overall heat transfer coefficient is addressed. This requires periodic
> cleaning of the shell as well as the tubes. Cleaning tubes may be more
> difficult if the pitch is triangular.
>
> **Utilities**
>
> The selection of utilities to be used in the shell and tubes tube
> exchanger takes into
>
> account the type of industry in which it is being operated and the
> desired parameters, such as the required power, thermal stability and
> thermal capacity.
>
> *Cooling* *Water*:
>
> Cooling water is used to cool and/or condense currents. The cooling
> water circulates inside heat exchangers. About 80% of the temperature
> reduction is due to the evaporation of the cooling water and the
> transfer of heat to the surrounding air.
>
> *Steam:*
>
> Steam is the most common heat utility used in the chemical industry
> and can be used to power pumps, compressors and heat exchangers. Using
> steam allows a more efficient heat source since the heat of
> condensation of the steam is quite high, which translates into a high
> yield per utility mass, at a constant temperature. Another reason is
> that steam is non-flammable, non-toxic and inert to various process
> fluids (more safe than other utilities like oil).
>
> **Conclusion**
>
> The simple design of a shell and tube heat exchanger makes it an ideal
> cooling solution for a wide variety of applications and as a
> consequence shell-and-tube heat exchangers are very popular and
> commonly found in industrial use.
>
> **References**
>
> \[1\] Notes on Transfer Phenomena II, Professor Maria Graça Carvalho,
> 2018/2019;
>
> \[2\] Warren D. Seider, University of Pennsylvania
>
> \[3\] Heat Transfer by Changel 2nd Edition
>
> \[4\] Heat Transfer by Holman 6th Edition
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9