Blame

374ad8 João Lopes 2025-03-13 11:57:41
1
<img src="./fa4pc54n.png"
2
style="width:3.085in;height:1.71389in" />
3
4
> Departamento de Engenharia Química
5
>
6
> Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia Química
7
>
8
> Integração e intensificação de processos
9
>
10
> Shell and Tubes Heat Exchangers
11
>
12
> **Docente** **Responsável:**
13
>
14
> Nuno Manuel Clemente de Oliveira
15
>
16
> **Integrantes** **do** **grupo:**
17
18
João Victor Vieira
19
20
> Matteo Gecchele
21
22
23
24
> **Introduction** **&** **Structure**
25
>
26
> The most common type of heat exchanger is the shell-and-tube, usually
27
> used in a lot of industrial applications. This type of heat exchanger
28
> has large number of tubes, sometimes several hundred, packed in a
29
> shell with their axes parallel to that of the shell. The heat transfer
30
> takes place between two fluid, one flowing inside the tubes and one
31
> flowing outside the tubes through the shell. Baffles are commonly
32
> placed in the shell to force the shell-side fluid to flow across the
33
> shell to enhance heat transfer, to maintain uniform spacing between
34
> the tubes and, also in order to maintain the turbulent flow inside the
35
> exchanger. The baffle spacing is usually not greater than a distance
36
> equal to the inside diameter or closer than a distance equal to
37
> one-fifth the inside diameter of the shell.
38
>
39
> Usually the shell-and-tube heat exchangers have large size and weight,
40
> and for this reason they are not using in automotive and aircraft
41
> applications. At both ends of the shell, the tubes open to some large
42
> flow areas, called headers, where the tube-side fluid accumulates
43
> before entering the tubes and after leaving them.
44
>
45
> Shell-and-tube heat exchangers are further classified according to the
46
> number of shell and tube passes involved. Heat exchangers in which all
47
> the tubes make one U-turn in the shell, for example, are called
48
> one-shell-pass and two-tube-passes heat exchangers. Likewise, a heat
49
> exchanger that involves two passes in the shell and four passes in the
50
> tubes is called a two-shell- passes and four-tube-passes heat
51
> exchanger.
52
53
<img src="./tnci3l31.png"
54
style="width:2.85417in;height:1.78125in" /><img src="./cncqllod.png"
55
style="width:2.57292in;height:2.02083in" />
56
57
> **Operation** **principle**
58
>
59
> In order to calculate the temperature difference ∆𝑡 in a 1-2
60
> exchanger, it is necessary to make some assumptions:
61
>
62
> 1\. The shell fluid temperature is an average isothermal temperature
63
> at any cross section
64
>
65
> 2\. There is an equal amount of heating surface in each pass 3. The
66
> overall coefficient of heat transfer is constant
67
>
68
> 4\. The specific heat of each fluid is constant 5. The flowrate of
69
> each fluid is constant
70
>
71
> 6\. There are not phase change (evaporation or condensation) in a part
72
> of the exchanger
73
>
74
> 7\. Heat losses are negligible
75
>
76
> The overall heat balance where ∆𝑡 is the true difference of
77
> temperatures, is:
78
>
79
> 𝑄 = 𝑈𝐴∆𝑡 = 𝑊𝐶(𝑇 − 𝑇 ) = 𝑤𝑐(𝑡2 − 𝑡1) where U is the heat transfer
80
> coefficient and A is the surface of contact.
81
>
82
> Shell-and-tube heat exchangers are complicated devices and the
83
> simplified approaches should be used with care. In fact, it is assumed
84
> that the overall heat transfer coefficient U is constant throughout
85
> the heat exchanger and that the convection heat transfer coefficients
86
> can be predicted using the convection correlations. However, in some
87
> practical application, the predicted value of U can exceed 30 percent.
88
> Thus, it is natural to tend to overdesign the heat exchangers in order
89
> to avoid unpleasant surprises.
90
>
91
> Heat transfer enhancement in heat exchangers is usually accompanied by
92
> increased
93
>
94
> pressure drop, and this causes higher pumping power. Therefore, any
95
> gain from the enhancement in heat transfer should be balanced against
96
> the cost of the accompanying pressure drop. Also, some thought should
97
> be given to which fluid should pass through the tube side and which
98
> through the shell side. Usually, the more viscous fluid is more
99
> suitable for the shell side (larger passage area and lower pressure
100
> drop) and the fluid with the higher pressure for the tube side.
101
>
102
> Usually, it is convenient to relate the equivalent temperature
103
> difference to the log
104
>
105
> mean temperature difference relation for the counter-flow case as
106
>
107
> ∆ 𝑙𝑚 = 𝐹∆ 𝑙𝑚,𝐶𝐹
108
109
where *F* is the correction factor**,** which depends on the geometry of
110
the heat exchanger and the inlet and outlet temperatures of the hot and
111
cold fluid streams. The
112
113
> ∆𝑇𝑚,𝐶𝐹 is the log mean temperature difference for the case of a
114
> counter-flow heat exchanger with the same inlet and outlet
115
> temperatures.
116
>
117
> The correction factor *F* for a shell-and-tube heat exchanger is shown
118
> in the figures below versus two temperature ratios *P* and *R* defined
119
> as
120
>
121
> 𝑡2 − 𝑡1 𝑇 − 𝑡1
122
>
123
> 𝑇 − 𝑇 𝑡2 − 𝑡1
124
>
125
> where the subscripts 1 and 2 represent the inlet and outlet*,*
126
> respectively. Note that for
127
>
128
> a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, *T* and *t* represent the shell-side
129
> and tube-side temperatures, respectively.
130
131
<img src="./gklfx0zi.png"
132
style="width:5.02431in;height:4.35569in" />
133
134
> **Factors** **that** **influence** **performances** *Fouling:*
135
>
136
> The performance of heat exchangers usually deteriorates with time as a
137
> result of accumulation of deposits on heat transfer surfaces. The
138
> layer of deposits represents additional resistance to heat transfer
139
> and this causes a decrease of the rate of heat transfer in a heat
140
> exchanger. The net effect of these accumulations on heat transfer is
141
> represented by a fouling factor, which is a measure of the thermal
142
> resistance introduced by fouling.
143
>
144
> For a shell-and-tube heat exchanger it possible to write the overall
145
> heat transfer relation as
146
>
147
> 𝑈𝐴𝑠 = 𝑈𝐴𝑖 = 𝑈0𝐴0 = 𝑅 = ℎ𝑖𝐴𝑖 + 𝐴𝑖𝑖 + ln⁡𝑈0𝐴0 𝑖) + 𝐴0 + ℎ0𝐴0
148
>
149
> where 𝐴𝑖 = 𝐷𝐿 and 𝐴0 = 𝐷0𝐿 L are the areas of inner and outer
150
> surfaces, and 𝑅,𝑖 and 𝑅,0 are the fouling factors at those surfaces.
151
>
152
> *Heat* *transfer* *rate:*
153
>
154
> The heat transfer rate is the most important parameter of a heat
155
> exchanger. A heat exchanger should be capable of transferring heat at
156
> the specified rate in order to achieve the desired temperature change
157
> of the fluid at the specified mass flow rate.
158
>
159
> *Size* *and* *Weight:*
160
>
161
> The heat exchanger is better if it is smaller and lighter, in
162
> particular, in the automotive and aerospace industries, where size and
163
> weight requirements are most stringent. For this reason,
164
> shell-and-tube heat exchangers cannot be used in this type of
165
> application. Also, a larger heat exchanger normally carries a higher
166
> price tag. The space available for the heat exchanger in some cases
167
> limits the length of the tubes that can be used.
168
>
169
> *Material:*
170
>
171
> The thermal and structural stress effects need not be considered at
172
> pressures below 15 *atm* or temperatures below 150*°C*. But these
173
> effects are major considerations above 70 *atm* or 550*°C* and
174
> seriously limit the acceptable materials of the heat exchanger.
175
>
176
> A temperature difference of 50*°C* or more between the tubes and the
177
> shell will probably pose differential thermal expansion problems and
178
> needs to be considered. In the case of corrosive fluids, we may have
179
> to select expensive corrosion-resistant materials such as stainless
180
> steel or even titanium.
181
>
182
> **Cost**
183
>
184
> The purchase cost of a shell and tube depends on the rear head type
185
> and on the heat transfer
186
>
187
> area (size factor). The relationship between the purchase cost and the
188
> size factor is
189
>
190
> represented in the graph below
191
192
<img src="./s1x5d1ti.png"
193
style="width:4.86667in;height:3.36917in" />
194
195
> Both fluids are usually forced to flow by pumps or fans that consume
196
> electrical power. The annual cost of electricity associated with the
197
> operation of the pumps and fans can be determined from
198
>
199
> 𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔⁡𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 𝑃𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔⁡𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟⁡\[𝑘𝑊\] × 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠⁡𝑜𝑓⁡𝑂𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛⁡\[ℎ\] ×
200
> 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑜𝑓⁡𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦⁡\[\$ 𝑘𝑊ℎ\]
201
>
202
> where the pumping power is the total electrical power consumed by the
203
> motors of the pumps and fans.
204
>
205
> Minimizing the pressure drop and the mass flow rate of the fluids will
206
> minimize the operating cost of the heat exchanger, but it will
207
> maximize the size of the heat exchanger and thus the initial cost. As
208
> a rule of thumb, doubling the mass flow rate will reduce the initial
209
> cost by half but will increase the pumping power requirements by a
210
> factor of roughly eight. Typically, fluid velocities encountered in
211
> heat exchangers range between 0.7 and 7 m/s for liquids and between 3
212
> and 30 m/s for gases. Low velocities are helpful in avoiding erosion,
213
> tube vibrations, and noise as well as pressure drop.
214
>
215
> **Advantages**:
216
>
217
> *Size:*
218
>
219
> Shell-and-tube heat exchangers are capable of providing a larger
220
> surface area for heat transfer to take place while having a shorter
221
> length overall due to presence of multiple tubes.
222
>
223
> *Heat* *duty:*
224
>
225
> Shell-and-tube heat exchangers can handle higher temperatures and
226
> pressures and hence higher heat duty. This is because besides
227
> providing a higher overall heat transfer coefficient, additions can
228
> also be made to negate thermal expansion effects and the thickness can
229
> also be varied (more in the next point).
230
>
231
> *Versatility:*
232
>
233
> From the design point of view, shell-and-tube heat exchangers are the
234
> most versatile of all heat exchangers. Being tubular in shape, heads /
235
> closures of required shape and thickness can be used. The number of
236
> tubes and tube pitch can be selected according to operating
237
> conditions. Expansion bellows can be used to negate thermal expansion
238
> effects, baffles if different cuts and spacings can be used to
239
> influence the overall heat transfer coefficients and there's even
240
> something called a floating head which can be added to negate thermal
241
> expansion of the tubes. The number of passes on shell side and tube
242
> side can be altered as well.
243
>
244
> **Disadvantages**:
245
>
246
> *Size:*
247
>
248
> This can also be a disadvantage as at lower heat duty, there are more
249
> compact heat exchangers such as plate type exchanger. Also, the
250
> absence of hairpin bends causes shell-and-tube heat exchangers to take
251
> up more space than double pipe heat exchangers in some cases.
252
>
253
> *Maintenance:*
254
>
255
> Cleaning of tubes is difficult and fouling is always an issue when
256
> overall heat transfer coefficient is addressed. This requires periodic
257
> cleaning of the shell as well as the tubes. Cleaning tubes may be more
258
> difficult if the pitch is triangular.
259
>
260
> **Utilities**
261
>
262
> The selection of utilities to be used in the shell and tubes tube
263
> exchanger takes into
264
>
265
> account the type of industry in which it is being operated and the
266
> desired parameters, such as the required power, thermal stability and
267
> thermal capacity.
268
>
269
> *Cooling* *Water*:
270
>
271
> Cooling water is used to cool and/or condense currents. The cooling
272
> water circulates inside heat exchangers. About 80% of the temperature
273
> reduction is due to the evaporation of the cooling water and the
274
> transfer of heat to the surrounding air.
275
>
276
> *Steam:*
277
>
278
> Steam is the most common heat utility used in the chemical industry
279
> and can be used to power pumps, compressors and heat exchangers. Using
280
> steam allows a more efficient heat source since the heat of
281
> condensation of the steam is quite high, which translates into a high
282
> yield per utility mass, at a constant temperature. Another reason is
283
> that steam is non-flammable, non-toxic and inert to various process
284
> fluids (more safe than other utilities like oil).
285
>
286
> **Conclusion**
287
>
288
> The simple design of a shell and tube heat exchanger makes it an ideal![](./xvze01o4.png)
289
290
> cooling solution for a wide variety of applications and as a
291
> consequence shell-and-tube heat exchangers are very popular and
292
> commonly found in industrial use.
293
>
294
> **References**
295
>
296
> \[1\] Notes on Transfer Phenomena II, Professor Maria Graça Carvalho,
297
> 2018/2019;
298
>
299
> \[2\] Warren D. Seider, University of Pennsylvania
300
>
301
> \[3\] Heat Transfer by Changel 2nd Edition
302
>
303
> \[4\] Heat Transfer by Holman 6th Edition